.
Cactus Juice Commentaries:
"Restart" in Mexico
The latest effort by Suzanne Monyak, writing for the news outlet of Roll Call. Com is a very lucid and provides an accurate description of President Biden's scheduled Novermber undertaking. And in her published writing and titled, "DHS To Restart 'Remain in Mexico' For Asylum -Seekers Next Month'" and dated October 15, 2021. And she clearly speaks of her knowledge base with the following:
The Homeland Security Department could restart as early as next month a controversial Trump administration border program requiring asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for their court dates, according to a court filing late Thursday night.
In a document filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the federal government said it "anticipates being in a position to re-implement” the so-called Remain in Mexico program, formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, “by mid-November.”
Under MPP, which began under the Trump administration and was formally terminated in June, asylum-seekers who cross the U.S.-Mexico border and request protection are required to wait in Mexico for decisions in their U.S. immigration court cases. The wait could be months, and the pandemic even stretched some to more than a year.
Following a lawsuit by Texas and Missouri, U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk ordered the Biden administration to make a good faith effort to reinstate the program, finding that the administration hadn’t sufficiently explained its reasons for ending it. Last month, the states filed a motion accusing the administration of delaying the reinstatement of the program in violation of that court order.
Jaango1--dated 10/19/21
The Homeland Security Department could restart as early as next month a controversial Trump administration border program requiring asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for their court dates, according to a court filing late Thursday night.
In a document filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the federal government said it "anticipates being in a position to re-implement” the so-called Remain in Mexico program, formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, “by mid-November.”
Under MPP, which began under the Trump administration and was formally terminated in June, asylum-seekers who cross the U.S.-Mexico border and request protection are required to wait in Mexico for decisions in their U.S. immigration court cases. The wait could be months, and the pandemic even stretched some to more than a year.
Following a lawsuit by Texas and Missouri, U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk ordered the Biden administration to make a good faith effort to reinstate the program, finding that the administration hadn’t sufficiently explained its reasons for ending it. Last month, the states filed a motion accusing the administration of delaying the reinstatement of the program in violation of that court order.
The Homeland Security Department could restart as early as next month a controversial Trump administration border program requiring asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for their court dates, according to a court filing late Thursday night.
In a document filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the federal government said it "anticipates being in a position to re-implement” the so-called Remain in Mexico program, formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, “by mid-November.”
Under MPP, which began under the Trump administration and was formally terminated in June, asylum-seekers who cross the U.S.-Mexico border and request protection are required to wait in Mexico for decisions in their U.S. immigration court cases. The wait could be months, and the pandemic even stretched some to more than a year.
Following a lawsuit by Texas and Missouri, U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk ordered the Biden administration to make a good faith effort to reinstate the program, finding that the administration hadn’t sufficiently explained its reasons for ending it. Last month, the states filed a motion accusing the administration of delaying the reinstatement of the program in violation of that court order.
The House Veterans Affairs Committee have completed the first of three hearings on military vets being enticed into joining insurrection-led organizations and likened to the January 6th example.
And the second and thirds hearings will be focused on the recruitment of veterans and the third hearing is expected to be address strategies that steer veterans away from these insurrectionist-type groups such as the Proud boys, Oath Keepers and the Three Percenters.
And furtzher today, the FBI and DOJ are 'processing' an approximately 650 insurrectionists and of which 71 have a history for being military veterans-oriented.
Odds and Ends
Despite the fact that Congress is not in session, the politics of today, keeps searching for a news outlet. And here are a few 'ideas' that have an internet or perceived news platform.
1. Newt Gingrich is a deadbeat with a $4.3 million debt, and still doesn't much care for self-imposed responsibility.
2. One of today's evangelical branches the AntiVaxxers are positing that the "vacination is the sign of the Beast."
3. With Congress taking testimony of the challenge that a fomer employee of Facebook has stipulated that "money" is the driving motivation for its corporate behavior, this political tempest will become known as the "algorithm battle" in the next several months.
4. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said Wednesday that changes in the format of oral arguments were made in part after research showed that female justices were interrupted more by male justices and advocates. According to CNN.
5. America’s banks firmly believe that everyone should pay their taxes, but a proposal in Congress would force banks to provide details to the IRS on what’s going in and out of almost every bank account in the country.
And next week's public protests will remain unabated.
Jaango1and posted on 10/15
Arizona's Senator Krysten Sinema Is Confronting Her Dilemma,
Between today and December, Senator Senator's political career is now in jeopardy and premised on her fateful decision for voting on Biden's Agenda, and in the semblance of a wholehearted accomplishment.
Further, Senator Sinema is facing a political decision of not of her making, and thusly, Arizona's Governor is now contemplating a decision-making process to challenge Sinema in 2023 or by reaching higher for his political apex, that being a challenge to President Biden's next reelection cycle.
Therefore, we, the Chicanos here in our wonderful Sonoran Desert, will bring forth a decision-making moment too and where our votes will determine the ousting of Senator Sinema and subsequently, having to address another Republican Governor starting in 2025.
By way of background for these 20 past years, I have been the political writer for the Chicano Veterans Organization and in which we have a membership roster of 40,000 vets. Consequently, can our membership 'shift' Sinema's future into a status of a non-Senator as well a new Governor, that is not Democratic Party affiliated?
Furthermore, her "agenda" is first and foremost, has been her affection for following the SCOTUS derived Citizens United complement and complimentary to today's toxic politics.
However, we, here in the Sonoran Desert, utilize a differing yardstick and which contains the following Three Elements.
1. The Native American Stereotype is "...He's just another white person."
2. The Chicano Stereotype is "...El Gringo quere componer todo con su 'I'm sorry."
3. The White Stereotype is "...I don't care...I'll be dead...So, what's your point?"
And in closing, much has been written and discussed among our nation's intelligencia, and today, we, the Chicanos, are awaiting the vote counting in both chambers of Congress and where the Biden Agenda achieves either its success or its failure.
Jaango1
Posted on 10/11
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder